ALL Talks About Gun Control Should Include Talks About Police Arms Limitations

Any talk about disarming civilians and limiting the kinds of firearms people can have, lacks any semblance of legitimacy unless we address the problem concerning police gangs.

We need to talk about the outright militarization of the police:

The rampant acts of police brutality across the nation:

Not to mention the endless numbers of incidents in which police gangs shoot and kill unarmed citizens.

Police Shoot Unarmed Man in the Back Execution Style in CA Local News Report...

On Dec. 10, 2003 an unarmed man was shot and killed in the southbound lane of I-185 in Columbus by a Muscogee County Sheriffs Office deputy. The 39-year-old victim was shot twice in the head with a 9mm MP5 submachine gun. Dougherty County D.A. Ken Hodges was appointed to handle the case by Georgia Attorney General Thurbert Baker.

Why aren't we talking about taking submachine guns away from the police, or guns, period? Oh yeah, because of the same argument we get mad at gun owners for using: cops need big powerful guns for self-defense.



An unarmed populace being watched over by armed psychopath cops. What could go wrong with that?

DISARM. DEFUND. REFORM.